Is DaySchedule: Appointment scheduling for 1:1, round-robin and group meetings agent-ready?

What we tested

Probed live on 23 Aug 2026 against rubric v1. 1 of 5 checks passed.

PROBE-VERIFIEDtier 2 of 3

—Markdown negotiationAccept: text/markdown

—Markdown twin at a predictable URL/page.md

—llms.txt/llms.txt

✓API catalogRFC 9727

—MCP server answers/.well-known/mcp/server-card.json → tools/list

What an agent could do here

Read from the page’s own content, with the wording each was drawn from. Inference is kept separate from tested facts — an agent completing the action is tier 3.

UNVERIFIED

book“Create your online appointment scheduling page to allow customers to easily view your real-time calendar availability and self-schedule appointments”

query_api“New booking API to fetch available time slots”

https://api.dayschedule.com/v1/availability

contact“Schedule a Demo”

track“Track your appointments on a single dashboard”

Context

6 sites in the index share the category appointment scheduling software, of which 6 are transactional.

How we grade

Three tiers. Every listing shows which one it has reached, and when. The rubric.

tier 1

Declared

The site says agents are welcome in its robots.txt. A permission, not a capability.

✓

tier 2

Probe-verified

We fetched the site and tested each signal ourselves. Dated, repeatable, re-checked on a schedule.

this site · 23 Aug 2026

tier 3

Behaviourally verified

An agent completed the action end to end — booked, bought, submitted — and it worked.

coming

Own this site?

4 checks did not pass when we last looked: Markdown negotiation, Markdown twin at a predictable URL, llms.txt, MCP server answers. Each is a small, specific fix; the rubric says exactly what we look for.

Behavioural verification — an agent completing your booking, purchase or contact flow end to end, with the date published here — opens to a small founding cohort first. Leave an email to be in it.